Father Pat Tucker
November 16, 2008
This Wednesday night is the parish meeting to discuss
the future of the parish with our Vicar, Bishop
Thomas Paproki and other priests who are part of
the process of appointing pastors to parishes.
While the ultimate say is with Cardinal George, our
system tries to follow the Catholic principal of subsidiarity,
which seeks to keep decisions relegated
to the level closest to where they are going to be
lived out.
The process of finding pastors for parishes has become
more difficult over the years for quite a few
reasons. First of all, the total number of priests is
down, and thus the number of priests who want to
be pastors as well as the number of priests who
are qualified to be pastors is lower. Even when
there were several priests in almost every parish,
there were always a some priests who felt that they
did not want to, could not, or should not be pastors
of parishes.
Another factor is the blending (marrying) of a priest
with a parish. Every parish has its own history and
identity, and, obviously, every priest is a unique
individual person as well. Just as couples learn that
not every man and woman should be married to
each other, so we cannot place just any priest in
any parish. Language requirements indicate one
level of obvious discernment, but issues like the
role of women in liturgy and the role of the laity in
the governance of the parish are matters that different
priests have different ideas about, and responses
to.
Another complication is the historic development of
parishes in the diocese. Because Chicago attracted
so many ethnic groups over the years,
many parishes were formed to serve the different
ethnic groups as they needed to become acculturated
in their new land. Today the remnants of
these ethnic parishes are all around us, without the
need for so many of them. The lack of priests to
staff them is also pertinent here.
And there is also to be considered the varying
needs and expectations that people have for their
pastor. Sometimes these can produce conflicting
expectations for a pastor and can create real tensions
in a parish or in a parish staff. The parishioners
have a right to let the powers that be know what
their expectations are for a pastor, but they need to
keep a sense of perspective and reality about the
abilities of any one priest to fulfill all expectations.
I mention these things to encourage you to take the
time on Wednesday to attend the meeting at 7:00
p.m. in Father Fearon Hall. The bishop and dean
will be particularly interested in determining the vitality
of the parish. The level of interest in the future
of the parish can be measured in many ways, but if
few people feel that the next pastor’s identity and
qualities are important, the powers that be may
wonder whether it is important to sustain a parish,
when there are other parishes close by with signs
of greater vitality.
I am, of course, interested in the future of Saint Bernardine
Parish. I have worked hard to guide and
support the efforts of the parishioners for over thirteen
years and would have liked to keep on doing
it. However, the policy of the archdiocese takes
precedence over priestly wishes, and so I also have
to be interested in where I will be assigned for my
(probably) final pastorate. I’ll be praying for the success
of both my successor here, as well as my destination
in June. I hope you will be doing the same.
|
 |
 |